Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DiskView

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Cheers, I'^mperator 18:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DiskView

This is not notable enough to be included on an wikipedia. I can't find much reference to it outside of download sites and the company website. There are no third party sources that discuss it. Rcurtis5 (talk) 23:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ - lots of downloads sites but coverage in reliable sources are few. I found this which is a very brief mention. And this PC Mag review, although it so short I would hesitate to really call it a review. -- Whpq (talk) 14:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - with the Winternals reference from Topthwolf, this squeaks by for me when combined with teh short reviews I already found. -- Whpq (talk) 02:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The very first hit I got in Google Books [1] was Winternals Defragmentation, Recovery, and Administration Field Guide (ISBN 1597490792) which gives this topic significant coverage. Further searches turn up even more information. Hardly not notable. --Tothwolf (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Whpq - lack of reliable sources. Yworo (talk) 19:50, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You might want to rephrase that. Joe Chill (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A software with as large as usebase as Diskview is obviously notable.Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 20:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per search made by Tothwolf. Looks like notability is sufficiently established. MuZemike 05:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Plenty of reliable sources have been found. Passes WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.